Proposed Taxi Tariff for South Oxfordshire
APPENDIX B: REPORT ON CONSULTATION
AUGUST 2022
ENGAGEMENT COMMUNICATION
A copy of the email notification is provided below.
Subject: Proposed Taxi Tariff for South Oxfordshire: have your say
You may recall that in
March 2021 we asked for your views on some proposed changes to our
Joint Taxi Licensing Policy. Following your feedback, we adopted
the policy, which includes setting a maximum taxi tariff for South
Oxfordshire. You can view the policy on our
website.
Setting a maximum tariff protects the public and ensures
consistency while still allowing for competition between companies.
New style meters also reduce fraud risks. There are only six
councils (including South Oxfordshire) in the country that do not
set a tariff.
In line with our
revised Joint Taxi Licensing Policy, this year we will be setting a
tariff for all licensed hackney carriages in South
Oxfordshire. We would now like to know what you think of
the proposed
tariff.
This consultation runs from Wednesday 29 June
until midnight on Wednesday 3 August 2022.
Please note, the figures we have used for our proposed tariff
follow the tariff set in the Vale of White Horse in 2014, adjusted
to take into account inflation since that date.
As the cost of living continues to increase, we are open to
reviewing the tariff again within the next 12 months.
How to comment
The quickest and easiest way to comment is to click here to use
our online
comment form
Note that this is a unique link just for you and is tied to your
email address. If you would like to forward this message to anybody
else, please refer them to the public link to the
survey.
Drop-in session
If you would like to discuss the tariff with one or our licensing
officers before providing your comments, please come along to our
drop-in session at Great
Western Park Community Centre on Tuesday
5 July between 1pm and 4pm.
What happens next
Once the consultation period ends, we will collate and review all
the responses. The process for adopting the tariff is as
follows:
Once the tariff comes
into place, you will need to update your taxi meter with your meter
company representative. We will allow a period of 1 month for this
to be done. The garage will check and seal your meter at the
time of your next compliance test.
We will publish the
tariff, along with the consultation statement and a consultation
summary report on our website.
We look forward to hearing your views.
Kind regards
Laura Driscoll
Licensing Team Leader
South Oxfordshire District Council
If you have any
questions about the proposed tariff, please
email licensing@southoxon.gov.uk or
call 01235 422556 (you will need to leave your name and number and
we will call you back).
If you have any queries about the survey or require it in an
alternative format (for example: large print, Braille, audio,
email, Easy Read or alternative languages) please
email haveyoursay@southandvale.gov.uk or
call 01235 422425.
Opt out: If you do not wish to receive emails like this
from us, please email licensing@southoxon.gov.uk or
call 01235 422556. Please note, we may still need to contact you
for certain consultations if we have a legal obligation to do
so.
Data protection: Please refer to our privacy policy
regarding how your personal data is used for this consultation,
available on the consultation page of our
website. If you would like to
know more about the council’s data protection registration or
to find out about your personal data, please
visit our
website.
This survey is aimed at taxi
drivers and proprietors licensed by the district council. If you're
an individual/ member of the public and would like to comment, you
can do so by completing the general comments box at the end of the
survey.
You may recall that in March 2021 we asked for your views on some
proposed changes to our Joint Taxi Licensing Policy. Following your
feedback, we adopted the policy, which includes setting a maximum
taxi tariff for South Oxfordshire. You can view the policy
on our
website.
Setting a maximum tariff protects the public and ensures
consistency while still allowing for competition between companies.
New style meters also reduce fraud risks. There are only six
councils (including South Oxfordshire) in the country that do not
set a tariff.
In line with our revised Joint Taxi Licensing Policy, this year we
will be setting a tariff for all licensed hackney carriages in
South Oxfordshire. We would now like to know what you think of
the proposed
tariff.
This consultation runs from Wednesday 29 June
until midnight on Wednesday 3 August 2022.
Please note, the figures we have used for our proposed tariff
follow the tariff set in the Vale of White Horse in 2014, adjusted
to take into account inflation since that date.
As the cost of living continues to increase, we are open to
reviewing the tariff again within the next 12 months.
Drop-in session
If you would like to discuss the tariff with one or our licensing
officers before providing your comments, please come along to our
drop-in session at Great
Western Park Community Centre on Tuesday 5
July between 1pm and 4pm.
What happens next?
Once the consultation period ends, we will collate and review all the responses. The process for adopting the tariff is as follows:
· If we receive any objections to the tariff, we will need to refer the matter to Cabinet for review. This would take place at the end of September 2022 and we could not adopt the tariff until after that meeting has taken place.
· If we do not receive any objections, the tariff will take effect in South Oxfordshire from 4 August 2022.
A bit about you...
1. Are you responding as: |
|||||
Answer Choices |
Response Percent |
Response Total |
|||
1 |
a driver/proprietor licensed by the district council |
|
90.63% |
58 |
|
2 |
an individual/member of the public |
|
9.38% |
6 |
|
3 |
Other (please specify): |
0.00% |
0 |
||
answered |
64 |
||||
skipped |
0 |
2. Which district council are you licensed by? |
|||||
Answer Choices |
Response Percent |
Response Total |
|||
1 |
South Oxfordshire |
|
98.28% |
57 |
|
2 |
Vale of White Horse |
|
1.72% |
1 |
|
3 |
Both |
0.00% |
0 |
||
4 |
Another council |
0.00% |
0 |
||
answered |
58 |
||||
skipped |
6 |
3. Please provide either your name, or trading name: |
|||
Answer Choices |
Response Percent |
Response Total |
|
1 |
Responses have been removed |
100.00% |
49 |
answered |
49 |
||
skipped |
15 |
||
4. Please provide your email address:
We ask for your email address to ensure we can contact you if we require any further clarification on your comments. Further information on data protection is available in our privacy statement. |
|||
Answer Choices |
Response Percent |
Response Total |
|
1 |
Responses have been removed |
100.00% |
47 |
answered |
47 |
||
skipped |
17 |
||
Proposed tariffs
This section of the survey could only be answered by drivers and proprietors.
We are asking for your views on three proposed tariffs depending on:
· time of day
· day of the week
· holidays
The tariff only applies to journeys which start and finish within South Oxfordshire district, not for journeys to destinations outside of the district.
You can view the proposed tariff documents here.
If you wish to compare these figures with other tariffs, the Private Hire Trade Monthly magazine produces a monthly table of all council tariffs which you can access here.
Please note, if we receive any objections to the tariff, we will need to refer the matter to Cabinet for review. This would take place at the end of September 2022 and we could not adopt the tariff until after that meeting has taken place. If we do not receive any objections, the tariff will take effect in South Oxfordshire from 4 August 2022.
5. Overall, how far do you agree or disagree with the proposed tariff?
6. You have disagreed with the proposed tariff for South Oxfordshire. To help us understand your reason(s) why, please answer the following statements.
Proposed tariff times, days and dates
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Neither agree nor disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly disagree |
I don't know |
No comment |
Response Total |
0.00% |
5.88% |
3.92% |
21.57% |
68.63% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
51 |
Minimum charge (‘flag fall’) for each tariff
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Neither agree nor disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly disagree |
I don't know |
No comment |
Response Total |
1.96% |
1.96% |
1.96% |
15.69% |
78.43% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
51 |
Subsequent distance charge
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Neither agree nor disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly disagree |
I don't know |
No comment |
Response Total |
1.96% |
1.96% |
0.00% |
25.49% |
70.59% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
51 |
Waiting time charge
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Neither agree nor disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly disagree |
I don't know |
No comment |
Response Total |
1.96% |
7.84% |
5.88% |
19.61% |
64.71% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
51 |
Charge per additional passenger when carrying 5+ passengers
Strongly agree |
Agree |
Neither agree nor disagree |
Disagree |
Strongly disagree |
I don't know |
No comment |
Response Total |
1.96% |
0.00% |
7.84% |
13.73% |
74.51% |
0.00% |
1.96% |
51 |
7. If you have any comments on the above statements, please provide your comments below.
ID number |
Comment |
Officer response |
194450994 |
I
think its not the time to put maximum and minimum charge!
|
The figures proposed in the consultation tariff put South Oxfordshire joint 16th highest tariff (out of 349 councils) for a two mile journey on Tariff 1. |
194452860 |
All that 3 tariff are ok with 1st
mile price but times can be easier: |
The different timings proposed are based on a higher rate for unsociable hours and officers would not support a large number of tariffs that could confuse customers. |
194479298 |
The fares should be higher if you compare the living costs now |
The figures proposed in the consultation tariff were based on an inflationary rise. |
194586446 |
£5.40 and £2.70 a mile was used 12 years ago as tariff 1. Most are using £6 flag and £3.20 to £3.50 a mile tariff one.we have not increased it since fuel has gone up 90%. Also Xmas and new years day should be double tariff one legally. Everyone who works I'm the UK are entitled to double pay during these times. Late night tariff two should be 10pm To 7am as its always been. Many other issues too.much to say here. |
The different timings proposed are based on a higher rate for unsociable hours. Using the figures on the left would result in a 2 mile tariff 1 fare of £9.20 to £9.50 which would place us 6th highest in the country. |
194644662 |
1st tariff : £6.50
subsequent 176 yard .£.30 |
Using the figures on the left would result in a 2 mile tariff 1 fare of £9.50 which would place us 6th highest in the country. |
194467333 |
Good day dear sir/madam, my name
is REDACTED. A south Oxfordshire taxi driver that based in Didcot
station taxi rank. I started my taxi career at Didcot in 2016. The
day tariff then is £5.00 first mile, £3.00per subsequent
mile. (07:00-17:59 Sunday-Saturday). £5.60 first mile,
£3.00per mile(18:00-21.59 Sunday to Saturday). £6.60
first mile & £3.20 from 22:00-06:59 Sunday to Saturday)
Waiting charge is 0.30per minute. |
The different timings proposed are based on a higher rate for unsociable hours. The daytime rates on the left are lower than the proposed £8.10 2 mile tariff 1 fare. |
194767343 |
Tariff one 6.50 start each addition mile 3.50 |
Using the figures on the left would result in a 2 mile tariff 1 fare of £10.00 which would place us joint 2nd highest in the country. |
194767627 |
Yes
|
There is insufficient detail to be able to respond to this comment.
|
194772824 |
the rates being provided by the council are not in line with the current level of inflation. |
The figures proposed in the consultation tariff were based on an inflationary rise. |
194815619 |
Tariffic one should be 600 first mile and each addition mile 300 |
Using the figures on the left would result in a 2 mile tariff 1 fare of £9.00 which would place us 6th highest in the country |
194583929 |
- Minimum charge - fuel costs
have increased recently and plate prices/insurance/maintenance has
all increased, the state of roads are awful and cars experience
damage so lowering costs is not feasible or appropriate |
Increasing the tariff 1 distance charge to £0.35 would result in a 2 mile tariff 1 fare of £8.90 which would place us 6th in the country. In view of the concerns reference additional passengers for vehicles which carry more than 4 passengers, officers are happy to propose an increase to the ‘extra’ charge per passenger to £1.50. |
194901282 |
The proposed tarrif prices are very low as you compare to the inflation and rising costs of living.The prices are going up day by day i mean just look at the fuel prices ther almost £2 per litre the insurance vehicle maintenance and also a safety check after 4 months when your vehicle is 7 years old.The council has rised there prices for license renewals application fees etc.The tarrif you have proposed not really worth the drivers. |
The figures proposed in the consultation tariff were based on an inflationary rise. |
194993280 |
Minimum fare at least
£6 |
Using the figures on the left would result in a 2 mile tariff 1 fare of £10.00 which would place us joint 2nd in the country. In view of the concerns reference additional passengers for vehicles which carry more than 4 passengers, officers are happy to propose an increase to the ‘extra’ charge per passenger to £1.50. |
195004466 |
Licensing,
|
Using the figures on the left would result in a 2 mile tariff 1 fare of £9.45 which would place us 6th highest in the country. In view of the concerns reference additional passengers for vehicles which carry more than 4 passengers, officers are happy to propose an increase to the ‘extra’ charge per passenger to £1.50. The different timings proposed are based on a higher rate for unsociable hours. Times required for application processing are clearly stated on our website and allow for the required checks to be carried out with the DBS and other agencies. |
195007512 |
Fuel prices are sky high. We drivers will be left with pennies after expense . |
The figures proposed in the consultation tariff were based on an inflationary rise. |
195028683 |
Because of the cost of leaving which is including the fuel price the day rate should me at lest £6 first mile than £3 thereafter and the night rate which is the second tariff should start at 5 o’clock pm ,thanks
My only comments on the day rate which I stated before ,thanks |
Using the figures on the left would result in a 2 mile tariff 1 fare of £9.00 which would place us 6th highest in the country. |
195486140 |
Christmas day boxing day new year
day should all double fare at least |
The different timings proposed are based on a higher rate for unsociable hours. In view of the concerns reference additional passengers for vehicles which carry more than 4 passengers, officers are happy to propose an increase to the ‘extra’ charge per passenger to £1.50. |
196045287 |
Fare one is ok but no one works for a seventeen hour shift without the pay going up I think it should be 6 until 6 then 6 to 11 then 11 to 6.bank holidays time and a half Christmas day double. |
The different timings proposed are based on a higher rate for unsociable hours. |
196058215 |
We should not be forced to accept something that is vale of white tariff from 2014 thankyou |
The figures proposed in the consultation tariff were based on an inflationary rise to the previous Vale tariff. |
196058328 |
Minimum wage is 9.70 per hour in the uk the Council is proposing I take a pay cut do to 5.70 do you think that is fair? I don’t think so then you have a tariff from 2014 it’s 2022 I think the council needs to think this through with the driver thankyou |
The figures proposed in the consultation tariff were based on an inflationary rise to the previous Vale tariff. |
196063247 |
Hi I'm not disagree of the tariff proposed from the council because of current expenses( insurance,fuel cost, insurance and plate badge all gone up etc). |
There is insufficient detail to be able to respond to this comment.
|
196193885 |
TARIFF 2 23.00 TO 00.59, TARIFF 3
01.00 TO 05.59 |
The different timings proposed are based on a higher rate for unsociable hours. Using the figures on the left would result in a 2 mile tariff 1 fare of £9.00 which would place us 6th in the country. In view of the concerns reference additional passengers for vehicles which carry more than 4 passengers, officers are happy to propose an increase to the ‘extra’ charge per passenger to £1.50. Officers are also happy to increase the soiling charge to £150. The last part of the response is unclear as this proposal does not relate to vehicle specification. |
196239888 |
Thank you for giving me an
opportunity to make a comment and share my opinion about the
proposed Taxi Tariffs. First of all, I think, in this uncertain
time, when inflation and fuel price are higher than ever in the UK,
it is not the right time to set up a maximum tariff for 12
months.
Thank you for reading
|
We are not proposing to set a tariff for 12 months. We have stated that we are likely to need to review again within 12 months. Using the figures on the left would result in a 2 mile tariff 1 fare of £8.40 which would place us joint 7th highest in the country. The different timings proposed are based on a higher rate for unsociable hours. The comment about days off is unclear, as the proposal does not require taxi drivers to work any amount of time. |
196442898 |
Given the cost of living increasing and the post covid crisis we are going through, the tariff charges proposed are unfair and fuel costs also have gone up so these are disproportionate
|
The figures proposed in the consultation tariff are based on an inflationary rise. |
ID: 196768800 ID: 197010412 ID: 197018608 ID: 196978895
|
Dear Sir / Madam,
|
The survey is the consultation route along with the newspaper notice, public notice at the office, newsletter, drop in session and rank visits conducted. Given there are almost 700 hackney carriages and over 1000 drivers licensed by the two districts, having a meeting with all drivers is not viable. The council is not aware of any drivers’ association and will make contact separately for future reference. |
196771181 |
I strongly object to the proposed tariffs set by the council because there has not been any proper consultation with the drivers or their representatives. I would like for the council to have a meeting with the South Oxfordshire and Vale of white horse taxi drivers’ association (S&VTDA) to discuss the new tariff. |
The survey is the consultation route along with the newspaper notice, public notice at the office, newsletter, drop in session and rank visits conducted. The council is not aware of any drivers’ association and will make contact separately for future reference. |
196832320 |
During this volatile period, when
fuel prices have increased over 60% within a 6 month term .
|
We have stated that we are likely to need to review again within 12 months as we are aware of concerns of continued rises in the cost of living. We can only set the tariff based on the figures we have at this time. The council is not responsible for the charges to work from the Didcot train station rank and it is not feasible to set different tariffs for hackney carriages which may work from Didcot train station rank. The tariff will be a maximum, so drivers are welcome to charge a lower fare if they choose to do so, to attract new customers. We are in the process of designing an information card for customers including how to complain, so we will not need to include this on the tariff card at this time. |
196906930 |
First of all i disagree with this
proposed tariff change. |
The different timings proposed are based on a higher rate for unsociable hours. In view of the concerns reference additional passengers for vehicles which carry more than 4 passengers, officers are happy to propose an increase to the ‘extra’ charge per passenger to £1.50. Officers are not proposing a separate tariff during Henley Regatta as we do not feel that people should be charged more simply because an event is taking place. |
196968693 |
will wait till meeting in Sep. |
There is insufficient detail to be able to respond to this comment. |
196970697 |
The Minimum charge on each tariff is very low.The timings on the traiff is not good as well because most of the south oxfordshire will be closed after 11pm.The traiff 2 should start at 09:00PM. |
The different timings proposed are based on a higher rate for unsociable hours. |
196978753 |
Waiting time is less and traiff times should change and we need tarriff for henley Regatta very long ques |
The different timings proposed are based on a higher rate for unsociable hours. Officers are not proposing a separate tariff during Henley Regatta as we do not feel that people should be charged more simply because an event is taking place. |
196978895 |
Traiff time change please and add henley regatta tariff |
The different timings proposed are based on a higher rate for unsociable hours. Officers are not proposing a separate tariff during Henley Regatta as we do not feel that people should be charged more simply because an event is taking place. |
Proposed tariffs
This section of the survey could only be answered by individuals / members of the public.
We are proposing three tariffs depending on:
· time of day
· day of the week
· holidays
The tariff only applies to journeys which start and finish within South Oxfordshire district, not for journeys to destinations outside of the district. The tariff also doesn't apply for pre-booked journeys.
You can view the proposed tariff documents here.
If you wish to compare these figures with other tariffs, the Private Hire Trade Monthly magazine produces a monthly table of all council tariffs which you can access here.
8. If you have any comments on the tariff, please provide them below.
ID number |
Comment |
Officer response |
196916203 |
To impose a tariff without talking to the taxi drivers is unacceptable.
|
The survey is the consultation route along with the newspaper notice, public notice at the office, newsletter, drop in session and rank visits conducted. |
196916090 |
There has been no consultation with the taxi drivers. |
The survey is the consultation route along with the newspaper notice, public notice at the office, newsletter, drop in session and rank visits conducted. |
196874620 |
No talk to drivers. Talk to drivers needed
|
The survey is the consultation route along with the newspaper notice, public notice at the office, newsletter, drop in session and rank visits conducted. |
196872609 |
I object to this as there has been no consultation with the drivers to agree a tariff, This is undemocratic and wrong |
The survey is the consultation route along with the newspaper notice, public notice at the office, newsletter, drop in session and rank visits conducted. |
196771457 |
I object to the proposed tariffs set by the council because there has not been any proper consultation with the drivers or their representatives |
The survey is the consultation route along with the newspaper notice, public notice at the office, newsletter, drop in session and rank visits conducted. The council is not aware of any drivers’ association and will make contact separately for future reference. |
196243939 |
I oppose these tariffs that have been imposed and believe the council should review them with a proper consultation with the taxi drivers.
|
The survey is the consultation route along with the newspaper notice, public notice at the office, newsletter, drop in session and rank visits conducted. |
Anything else?
9. If you have any other comments on the proposed tariff, please provide them below.
ID number |
Comment |
Officer response |
194450994 |
Bad proposal. |
There is insufficient detail to be able to respond to this comment. |
194454531 |
What about tariff during |
Officers are not proposing a separate tariff for events as we do not feel that people should be charged more simply because an event is taking place. |
194452860 |
Minimum card payments £8 is
considered
|
Officers are not proposing a minimum for card payments at this time but will conduct more research on this in the coming months for the next review. It may be that officers look to recommend making it mandatory for hackney carriages to accept card payments, as this was included in the responses to the joint taxi licensing policy consultation in 2021. |
194495265 |
Hi. Second tariff should be on From 22:00 Like most of the taxis. Mini bus journey over 4 passengers should be 50% higher than regular reason: much higher fuel consumtion higher car exploatation, much higher repair cost and also price for cars are higher than regular and if driver its able take more than 4 mean customer don't need 2 cars what give IT to him 50% savings any way. |
The different timings proposed are based on a higher rate for unsociable hours. In view of the concerns reference additional passengers for vehicles which carry more than 4 passengers, officers are happy to propose an increase to the ‘extra’ charge per passenger to £1.50. |
194553744 |
Tariff one: 1st Mile should be :
6.95 and subsequent 176 yard @0.30 |
Using the figures on the left would result in a 2 mile tariff 1 fare of £9.95 which would place us 3rd highest in the country. |
194767343 |
Tarriff 2 800 start each addition mile 3.50 also tarriq two should start 2200 hrs |
The different timings proposed are based on a higher rate for unsociable hours. |
194767627 |
Tariff 1 should be £7 start & each additional mile £3 |
Using the figures on the left would result in a 2 mile tariff 1 fare of £10.00 which would place us joint 2nd highest in the country. |
194772824 |
we should also have a rate for henley week |
Officers are not proposing a separate tariff for events as we do not feel that people should be charged more simply because an event is taking place. |
194815619 |
Tarrif 2 should start at 10 pm |
The different timings proposed are based on a higher rate for unsociable hours. |
194833295 |
Petrol is very expensive
|
The figures proposed in the consultation tariff are based on an inflationary rise. |
194901282 |
There should be slightly more rise in tarrif like £1 extra in flag and 10p more increase in each tarrif and also should reduce the time of tarrif one from 10.59pm to 6pm.
|
Assuming they mean charge an £0.37 for distance, using the figures on the left would result in a 2 mile tariff 1 fare of £10.10 which would place us 2nd highest in the country. The different timings proposed are based on a higher rate for unsociable hours. |
195036605 |
The price for the tariff is good.
My only concern is the mpv6 and mpv8 these vehicles are nearly
double the price of a car also to run. I would say a mpv6 has to be
50% price increases of the total tariff and the Mpv8 should be at
least 85% increase in tariff. |
In view of the concerns reference additional passengers for vehicles which carry more than 4 passengers, officers are happy to propose an increase to the ‘extra’ charge per passenger to £1.50. |
195089543 |
Tariff 1 £6.00 |
Using the figures on the left would result in a 2 mile tariff 1 fare of £10.00 which would place us joint 2nd highest in the country. In view of the concerns reference additional passengers for vehicles which carry more than 4 passengers, officers are happy to propose an increase to the ‘extra’ charge per passenger to £1.50. |
195274160 |
Inflation increasing every year,diesel price ales increased. |
The figures proposed in the consultation tariff are based on an inflationary rise. |
195486140 |
Which everything increasing in price why are proposing tarriff lower than what some companies are already using |
The figures proposed in the consultation tariff are based on an inflationary rise |
196045287 |
I don't have a people carrier but
you need a different tariff for them because it saves the people
from having two taxis. You have based your tariffs on the vale i
work out of didcot and have to pay to go on the rank at the
station |
In view of the concerns reference additional passengers for vehicles which carry more than 4 passengers, officers are happy to propose an increase to the ‘extra’ charge per passenger to £1.50. |
196057814 |
South Oxford & Vale of White
Horse District Council Joint Taxi Tariffs v0.1
|
This comment has not replicated clearly unfortunately. It appears to suggest figures which would result in a 2 mile tariff 1 fare of £10.00 which would place us joint 2nd highest in the country.
|
196442898 |
Tariff charges should be increased as the proposed tariff is far too low and fuels costs and car maintenance and running of the taxis is not covered proportionately.
|
The figures proposed in the consultation tariff are based on an inflationary rise.
|
196771181 |
As the current proposed tariff
cannot be adopted, it will now need to be taken to the Cabinet for
a review as per council guidelines.
|
The council is not aware of any drivers’ association and will make contact separately for future reference. The survey is the consultation route along with the newspaper notice, public notice at the office, newsletter, drop in session and rank visits conducted. |
196771457 |
The council need to speak to the drivers to sort out the tariff
|
The survey is the consultation route along with the newspaper notice, public notice at the office, newsletter, drop in session and rank visits conducted.
|
196832320 |
Same as I mentioned, previously
.
|
This is not a consultation about whether to have a tariff; that has already been agreed as part of the policy in 2021.
|
196872609 |
Please speak to the drivers to set the tariff |
The survey is the consultation route along with the newspaper notice, public notice at the office, newsletter, drop in session and rank visits conducted.
|
196874620 |
Talk to the drivers |
The survey is the consultation route along with the newspaper notice, public notice at the office, newsletter, drop in session and rank visits conducted.
|
196916090 |
The council needs to consult with the taxi drivers. Not just impose a tariff on them |
The survey is the consultation route along with the newspaper notice, public notice at the office, newsletter, drop in session and rank visits conducted.
|
196916203 |
Discuss with the taxi drivers to agree tariff
|
The survey is the consultation route along with the newspaper notice, public notice at the office, newsletter, drop in session and rank visits conducted.
|
196968693 |
offered tariff is not completely fit for work. |
There is insufficient detail to be able to respond to this comment.
|
196970697 |
We all as a driver never get a chance to tell council what are over views and I personally feel there is a communication gap in council and drivers.
|
The survey is the consultation route along with the newspaper notice, public notice at the office, newsletter, drop in session and rank visits conducted.
|
196978753 |
Please reconsider as south oxfordshire is mostly countryside area business closed in evening hardly any people after 23:00
|
There is insufficient detail to be able to respond to this comment.
|
Our commitment to equal access for all
We are committed to making sure that residents have equal access to all council services. Please help us to keep track of how successfully we are achieving this by ticking the appropriate boxes below.
All questions are optional. All information is confidential and will only be used to help us monitor whether views differ across the community.
10. So we can understand if we have reached everyone we need to, please tell us the first part of your postcode in the box below, e.g., OX10
46 respondents provided us with a postcode and the results are shown below.
Berkshire |
Buckinghamshire |
Oxfordshire |
RG RG2 RG31 RG6 RG9 (X10)
SL1 (X3)
|
HP12 (X6) HP13 (X3)
|
OX3 OX4 OX9 OX10 (X6) OX11 (X9) OX38 OX93
|
11. Which of the following describes how you identify yourself?
12. How old are you?
13. What is your ethnic group? |
|||||
Answer Choices |
Response Percent |
Response Total |
|||
White |
|||||
1 |
English, Welsh, Scottish, Northern Irish, British |
|
25.93% |
14 |
|
2 |
Irish |
0.00% |
0 |
||
3 |
Gypsy or Irish Traveller |
0.00% |
0 |
||
4 |
Any other white background |
|
12.96% |
7 |
|
Asian or Asian British |
|||||
5 |
Indian |
|
3.70% |
2 |
|
6 |
Pakistani |
|
42.59% |
23 |
|
7 |
Bangladeshi |
|
3.70% |
2 |
|
8 |
Chinese |
0.00% |
0 |
||
9 |
Any other Asian background |
|
1.85% |
1 |
|
Black or Black British |
|||||
10 |
Caribbean |
0.00% |
0 |
||
11 |
African |
0.00% |
0 |
||
12 |
Any other black background |
0.00% |
0 |
||
Mixed or Multiple Ethnic Groups |
|||||
13 |
White and Black Caribbean |
0.00% |
0 |
||
14 |
White and Black African |
0.00% |
0 |
||
15 |
White and Asian |
|
1.85% |
1 |
|
16 |
Any other mixed background |
|
7.41% |
4 |
|
Other Ethnic Group |
|||||
17 |
Arab |
0.00% |
0 |
||
18 |
Other (please specify): |
0.00% |
0 |
||
answered |
54 |
||||
skipped |
10 |
14. Are your day to day activities limited because of a health problem or disability which has lasted or is expected to last 12 months or more? |
|||||||
Answer Choices |
Response Percent |
Response Total |
|||||
1 |
Yes |
|
3.85% |
2 |
|||
2 |
No |
|
94.23% |
49 |
|||
3 |
Prefer not to say |
|
1.92% |
1 |
|||
answered |
52 |
||||||
skipped |
12 |
||||||
If yes, please specify: (1) |
|||||||
|
END.